How Giant Bets
on Natural Gas
Sank Brash Hedge-Fund Trader
Up
in Summer, Brian Hunter
Lost $5 Billion in a Week
As Market Turned on Him
A
Low-Profile Life in
By ANN DAVIS
September 19, 2006; Page A1
Last week, he fell hard, proof of how
quickly fortunes can reverse in gyrating commodities markets.
Here in this bustling new energy frontier, Mr. Hunter headed the
energy desk for a
His losses savaged returns for Amaranth, dragging its assets
under management down to $4.5 billion from $9 billion at the start of
September. In disclosing the losses to investors in a letter yesterday, the
fund said it was "aggressively reducing" its natural-gas bets, though
Mr. Hunter remains at the fund. (Even as Amaranth was losing, some gas traders
were winning)
What hurt Mr. Hunter is what he had ridden to glory for the past
year or so: volatility.
Though
unknown in public, he had created a buzz on Wall Street -- a wunderkind to
some, a ticking bomb to others. From a cramped trading desk here, he thrived on
big price swings, reaping billions of dollars on price declines and surges
alike. But late last week, he watched with growing alarm as gas prices took a
steep dive, particularly in futures contracts for delivery of gas for this
coming winter. His losses mounted in after-hours trading last weekend.
"The cycles that play out in the oil market can take
several years, whereas in natural gas, cycles take several months," Mr.
Hunter said in an interview late in July, when his returns were looking rosy.
"Every time you think you know what these markets can do, something else
happens."
At that time, Mr. Hunter had more than $3 billion of bets
outstanding, investors familiar with the funds'
holdings say. Soon thereafter, a heat wave caused gas prices to go haywire, then soar. Many traders took hits. One energy-trading firm, MotherRock L.P. in
An increasing number of big commodity players are bypassing the
geopolitics of oil for the most-volatile major commodity: natural gas. The
blue-burning fuel heats 52% of
Unlike oil, gas can't readily be moved about the globe to fill
local shortages or relieve local surpluses. Forecasts of freezing
Backed by borrowed money and a deep-pocketed fund, Mr. Hunter
took on more exposure to certain futures contracts than do some big investment
banks employing more than 100 energy traders, say several traders and
ex-colleagues. He sometimes held open positions to buy or sell tens of billions
of dollars of commodities.
He was up for the year roughly $2 billion by April, scoring a
return of 11% to 13% that month alone, say investors in the Amaranth fund. Then
he had a loss of nearly $1 billion in May when prices of gas for delivery far
in the future suddenly collapsed, investors add. He won back the $1 billion
over the summer, only to lose that and much more last week.
The whiplash trading in these markets could work to the
detriment of energy consumers. Some consumer advocates, utilities and federal
officials say speculation in the energy markets accentuates the volatility of
this staple fuel and that the increased volatility, in itself, hurts consumers.
Volatility makes it harder for utilities and municipalities to determine the
best time to buy gas for their operations. Many utilities made gas purchases
over the past year that proved to be poorly timed. They passed on those costs
to electricity and heating customers, even as futures prices were dropping.
'A Typical Mistake'
While energy consumers have seen their bills rise,
many traders' paychecks have soared. Mr. Hunter is estimated to have taken home
$75 million to $100 million last year.
His swift reversal calls into question how well some hedge funds
grasp the risk they are taking in the now-popular energy markets. Vince
Kaminski, a risk-management expert who protested chancy trades while at Enron
Corp. and until recently was at Citigroup Inc.'s commodities desk, said
yesterday that it is dangerous to take giant positions in relatively shallow
markets, which certain months are in gas futures. "This is a typical
mistake of inexperienced and aggressive traders," he said. Mr. Hunter
"appeared to have a position that the entire market knew about. The markets
are very cruel." Citing a well-known epigram, Mr. Kaminski added,
"'The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.'"
Nick Maounis, Amaranth's founder and
chief executive, said in August that more than a dozen members of his
risk-management team served as a check on his star gas trader. "What Brian
is really, really good at is taking controlled and measured risk," Mr. Maounis said. Mr. Maounis
declined to comment yesterday.
When Mr. Hunter began trading gas eight years ago, it was far
less volatile, hovering under $2 a million BTUs. Mr. Hunter had grown up in
farm country near
Mr. Hunter joined TransCanada Corp., a
Mr. Hunter, then 24, came armed with fresh theories about
options pricing and impressed his bosses with his ability to spot price
anomalies. They gave him increasing amounts of money to trade with after early
successes. Among them: He convinced them that options in Canadian gas were underpriced as a pipeline from Canada to Chicago was set to
open and create a greater market for it.
"He helped us prove that mathematically...and it paid off
hugely," says Shondell Sabad,
a former colleague there who now trades for a Calgary bank.
Traders like Mr. Hunter make complex wagers on gas at multiple
points in the future, betting, say, that it will be cheap in the summer if
there is a lot of supply, but expensive by a certain point in the winter. Mr.
Hunter closely watches how weather affects prices and whether conditions will
lead to more, or less, gas in a finite number of underground storage caverns.
Roughly akin to counting cards in bridge, a trader keeps track of how much gas
is injected into storage and how much might have been withdrawn for various
uses.
Mr. Hunter moved to Wall Street to do the same work for more
pay. He joined Deutsche
Bank's energy desk and gained a name trading
Mr. Hunter personally generated $17 million in profit in 2001
and $52 million in 2002, according to a complaint he later brought in state
court in
In December 2003, just as his group was close to ending the year
up $76 million, he claimed in the suit, things went awry. In a single week,
they had losses of $51.2 million, he said in the suit. He blamed "an
unprecedented and unforeseeable run-up in gas prices" along with
"well-documented and widely known problems with" Deutsche Bank's
electronic-trade-monitoring and risk-management software, which he said hurt
traders' ability to extricate themselves from bad trades. Deutsche Bank denied
its systems were to blame.
Mr. Hunter argued that even though the desk as a whole posted a
loss, he personally made trades that netted the bank $40 million that year. He
and his natural-gas colleagues got no bonus. By February 2004, relations had
soured to the point that supervisors locked him out of the trading system and
made him an analyst, moving him off the desk. Mr. Hunter left in April and
subsequently sued over the withheld bonus and claimed Deutsche Bank defamed
him. It denied the allegations. The suit is pending.
Mr. Maounis, the head of Amaranth,
took a chance on Mr. Hunter. Amaranth was one of the first hedge funds to build
an energy desk soon after the demise of Enron, under the leadership of former
Enron energy trader Harry Arora. Messrs. Arora and Maounis hired Mr.
Hunter and initially kept him on a tight leash. Mr. Maounis
says the firm knew of Mr. Hunter's history at Deutsche Bank but did extensive
checks and found "nothing that made us uncomfortable."
Mr. Arora was relatively conservative
and sought to make diversified commodities investments. He brought Mr. Hunter
along and the energy group posted steady annual returns of 20% to 40%.
Mr. Hunter wanted to make bigger bets in his main market, gas.
He had an ability to keep calm with huge bets on the line and markets were
going berserk. In July 2005, for instance, he was in
Around that time, Amaranth agreed Messrs. Hunter and Arora could separate their trading "books," each
controlling his own trades. Then late last year, the double-whammy of
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita made Mr. Hunter a hero at Amaranth and a minor
legend on Wall Street, as he made $1 billion for Amaranth.
Mr. Hunter trolls for what he calls mispriced
options -- that is, the chance to buy or sell something at a price that appears
farfetched to the market but that Mr. Hunter sees as a distinct possibility.
Leading up to the hurricanes, his bets included a complex portfolio of options
based on the idea that gas could get extremely expensive in the early fall. An option to buy gas at, say, $12 cost very little in summer 2005
because gas was then trading at only $7 to $9. When it surged past $13
after hurricanes ravaged
His success was a rebuke to his ex-colleagues at Deutsche Bank,
where lawyers were wrangling with him over his request to take depositions from
former superiors, even as he was banking big profits. It also was hard for Mr. Arora, still his boss but not the main rainmaker. Mr. Arora eventually left to start his own hedge fund.
It was vindication for Mr. Hunter. In its annual Christmas card,
Amaranth referred to its energy-market winnings by quoting Benjamin Franklin:
"Energy and persistence alter all things." It sent out toy gasoline
pumps.
Amaranth agreed to let Mr. Hunter trade from his hometown of
From his desk on a trading floor, Mr. Hunter monitored dozens of
"instant messaging" tabs from brokers and pored over weather screens.
Six traders were there on one day this summer, in a space crammed with boxes of
KitKats and Hershey bars, microwave popcorn and bags
of running clothes. The only fancy touch was a basketball signed by Michael
Jordan encased in Lucite.
'A New Level of Liquidity'
Bruno Stanziale, a former Deutsche
Bank colleague now at Société Générale,
works with energy companies that need to hedge their production. In an
interview in July, he contended Mr. Hunter was helping the market function
better and gas producers to finance new exploration, such as by agreeing to buy
the rights to gas for delivery in 2010. "He's opened a market up and
provided a new level of liquidity to all players," Mr. Stanziale
said.
Mr. Hunter saw that a surplus of gas this summer could lead to
low prices, but he also made bets that would pay off if, say, a hurricane or
cold winter sharply reduced supplies by the end of winter. He also was willing
to buy gas in even farther-away years, as part of complex strategies.
Buying what is known as "winter" gas years into the
future is a risky proposition because that market has many fewer traders than
do contracts for months close at hand. Deals for those far-away months are
often done in over-the-counter transactions that can be hard to exit. In May,
his team's position fell nearly $1 billion when the prices of far-forward gas
contracts took a steep dive -- much as they did last week. In this case, a
number of gas producers suddenly sold more gas than Mr. Hunter expected.
By summer, Mr. Hunter appeared to be proving doubters wrong.
Amaranth's overall fund gained around 6% in June, was roughly flat in July and
rose 6% in August, according to investors.
Although Mr. Hunter had fared well, many traders say he was acquiring
positions that were too large to get out of if the market turned -- including a
bullish bet on winter gas. Amaranth won't detail its positions or his trading
strategy, so it is unclear exactly what hurt Mr. Hunter so badly last week. In
recent weeks, people familiar with the transactions say, Amaranth bought MotherRock's gas positions in an attempt to cancel some of
its trades and reduce its market exposure.
Expectations of a warmer-than-average winter are rising. Last
week, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said the El Niño
weather phenomenon has formed in the
Amaranth has scrapped plans relayed only a month ago to
investors to offer them a separate energy-only portfolio.
Congress, meanwhile, is jumping into the debate on whether hedge
funds exacerbate volatility. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission argued in
a 2005 report that hedge-fund trading didn't increase volatility and even
improved the functioning of the markets by giving energy firms more trading
partners. A recent report by the Senate Investigations Committee contended
energy markets were badly underpoliced. It cited an
explosion of trading on electronic-trading systems and over-the-counter
platforms over which the CFTC has no authority -- and in which Mr. Hunter and
other big traders are extremely active.